The opening day of the Esports World Cup (EWC) Warzone competition in Riyadh delivered a series of surprising results, challenging preconceptions and raising questions about the nature of competitive Warzone.
Z Smit, previously accused of cheating in online play by ourselves too in which we clearly showed his silent/aimbot and showing inconsistent results at 2023 LAN WSOW, raised eyebrows with a 14-kill performance in the opening match in resrugence. While this LAN showing might seem to counter past allegations, it's important to consider the broader context of competitive Warzone.
Many players in this event may have relied on various advantages in online play to secure their spots here. The EWC, with its seemingly low-skill ceiling and emphasis on grinding games without cheats, could be rewarding those who've practiced more in “clean” environments.
Adding another layer of complexity, the EWC setup appears to feature high-quality audio amplification, potentially giving players access to sound information beyond what's typically available. This creates an unusual competitive environment that may not accurately reflect true skill or online performance but we must note everyone appears to have those same capabilities here.
Ultimately, while Smit's performance is noteworthy, it exists within a tournament structure that raises questions about the nature of competitive Warzone and how we evaluate player skill across different settings.
We feel many other reputable players should have been given spots.
The highly-touted Falcons team, consisting of cheat group SSD aka Shifty, Biffle, and Hisoka, found themselves struggling to maintain their usual dominance. These players, known for their extensive practice in private, invite-only scrimmages, seemed unprepared for the chaotic nature of solo play on Rebirth Island.
Critics have long argued that the controlled practice environments favored by top teams like the Falcons may be detrimental to true competitive growth. The team's underwhelming performance on day one seems to support this theory, though the solo format admittedly differs from their usual trio gameplay.
These private scrimmages, often organized by SSD, potentially allow for exploitation of player tendencies and the cultivation of a repetitive meta. By constantly practicing in a controlled environment, teams like the Falcons may develop strategies that are less effective against the chaos and unpredictability of open competition.
More concerningly, there have been allegations of questionable practices within these private matches. Reports suggest that some players, including ShiftyTV and Lenun (as documented by CallOfShame during WSOW), have been caught watching Repullze's watch party on secondary monitors during scrims. This behavior, if true, could provide an unfair advantage by allowing players to gather real-time intel on opponents' strategies and positions.
These practices, combined with the controlled scrim environment, may create an artificial sense of dominance that doesn't translate to more open competitive formats. The Falcons' struggles on day one of the EWC could be seen as evidence of this disconnect between practice and true competition.
The solo seeding stage results have sparked debate about the true nature of competitive Warzone skill. Players like Okie, Vision, and even substitute Stable J managed to outperform some of the most recognizable names in the scene. This raises questions about whether the established hierarchy of Warzone talent is as solid as previously thought.
While day one provided plenty of excitement and unexpected outcomes, it's crucial to remember that this is just the beginning of the tournament. The group stages, where players reunite with their trios, may paint a very different picture of the competitive landscape.
As we move forward, it will be interesting to see if players like Z Smit can maintain their “impressive” form, and whether teams like the Falcons can adapt and regain their expected dominance really interesting to see the gameplay away from… the… you know… 😉
Player Name | Emoji | 4 Games Average | Total Kills in All 4 Games |
---|---|---|---|
Patzukka | 🔵🔵🔵 | 8.75 | 35 |
VisionSr | 🔵🔵🔵 | 8.25 | 33 |
zSmit | 🔵🔵🔵 | 8 | 32 |
OEKIY | 🔵🔵🟠| 6.75 | 27 |
bbreadman | 🔵🔵🟠| 6.75 | 27 |
Almond | 🔵🔵🟠| 6.5 | 26 |
KingAj | 🔵🟠🟠| 5.75 | 23 |
Levi | 🔵🟠🟠| 5.75 | 23 |
Aydan | 🔵🟠🟠| 6.25 | 25 |
Dongy | 🔵🟠🟠| 5.5 | 22 |
Jackal | 🔵🟠🟠| 5.25 | 21 |
CamZ | 🔵🟠🟠| 5.5 | 22 |
Tommey | 🟠🟠🟠| 5 | 20 |
BuLieVe | 🟠🟠🟠| 5.25 | 21 |
Knight | 🟠🟠🟠| 5 | 20 |
Shifty | 🟠🟠🟠| 5.25 | 21 |
stukex | 🟠🟠🟠| 4.5 | 18 |
DiazBiffle | 🟠🟠🟠| 4.5 | 18 |
xizx7 | 🟠🟠🟠| 4.5 | 18 |
Rocket | 🟠🟠🟠| 4.75 | 19 |
Stewo | 🟠🟠🟠| 5 | 20 |
zDark | 🟠🟠🟠| 4.5 | 18 |
Lenun | 🟠🟠🟠| 4.5 | 18 |
i_hmoodx | 🟠🟠🟠| 4.25 | 17 |
Prxdigy | 🟠🟠🟠| 4.5 | 18 |
Jukeyz | 🟠🟠🔴 | 3.25 | 13 |
ForeignJase | 🟠🟠🟠| 4.75 | 19 |
WarsZ | 🟠🟠🔴 | 3.5 | 14 |
elolam | 🟠🟠🔴 | 4 | 16 |
iZund | 🟠🟠🟠| 4.25 | 17 |
Tenux | 🟠🟠🔴 | 3.75 | 15 |
Jtecc | 🟠🟠🔴 | 3.75 | 15 |
Braalik | 🟠🟠🔴 | 3.5 | 14 |
Rxul | 🟠🟠🔴 | 3.25 | 13 |
Natedogg | 🟠🟠🟠| 4.25 | 17 |
Intechs | 🟠🟠🔴 | 3.75 | 15 |
Hisoka | 🟠🟠🔴 | 3.25 | 13 |
Jay | 🟠🔴🔴 | 2.5 | 10 |
abWizz | 🟠🟠🔴 | 3.25 | 13 |
boogs | 🟠🟠🔴 | 3.5 | 14 |
Zachar | 🟠🟠🔴 | 3.25 | 13 |
Newbz | 🟠🟠🔴 | 3.5 | 14 |
Mojo1337 | 🟠🔴🔴 | 2.5 | 10 |
HardTrevs | 🟠🔴🔴 | 3 | 12 |
Rodr1qo | 🟠🔴🔴 | 3 | 12 |
Deus Amir | 🟠🔴🔴 | 3 | 12 |
Crmz | 🟠🔴🔴 | 3 | 12 |
Castillo | 🟠🔴🔴 | 3 | 12 |
JoeWo | 🟠🔴🔴 | 2.75 | 11 |
Lymax | 🟠🔴🔴 | 2.75 | 11 |
Dreyk | 🟠🔴🔴 | 2.5 | 10 |
Zepa | 🟠🔴🔴 | 2.75 | 11 |
Daga | 🟠🔴🔴 | 2.75 | 11 |
imLX | 🟠🔴🔴 | 2.5 | 10 |
Qlapr | 🔴🔴🔴 | 2.25 | 9 |
METHODZSICK | 🟠🔴🔴 | 2.5 | 10 |
HusKerrs | 🔴🔴🔴 | 2.25 | 9 |
Enxiun | 🟠🔴🔴 | 2.5 | 10 |
LiaM | 🔴🔴🔴 | 2 | 8 |
LuKinas | 🔴🔴🔴 | 2 | 8 |
KingMatii | 🔴🔴🔴 | 1.75 | 7 |
Skullface | 🔴🔴🔴 | 1.5 | 6 |
Nenuz | 🔴🔴🔴 | 1.25 | 5 |
This breakdown provides a quick visual representation of how players performed relative to expectations, with some surprising results at both ends of the spectrum.